Issues of Right-to-Life

The courts have to uphold the law, only when under the Human Rights Act "no one shall be subjected to torture or inhumane or degrading interposition or punishment," and making this fair sex take in through the horrors of this disorder would certainly qualify as inhumane and degrading treatment.

4. The adult female would prefer to die at a time of her possess choosing; her husband would like to assist her; the court would like to hamper the woman from ending her life.

5. The woman could go ahead and guard her own life, with the assistance of her husband. The top hat case scenario is that she dies peacefully and nought happens to her husband. The worst case scenario is she dies and her husband is charged with aiding and abetting a suicide. The husband will be harmed because he will face toss out time if convicted. The devoutly religious would probably object to this pass over of action, but they are not involved directly in the case. There are no rules or principles which would automatically demoralize this choice.

The woman could suffer through the tortures of the disease until her death. There is no best case scenario for this choice. The worst case scenario is that the woman would suffer terribly and her husband would suffer watching his wife suffering. The woman would be harmed because her suffering would be pro doggeded. The husband would be harmed because he would have to watch his wife suffer for an extended time. honor th

The woman could move to a country with more humane assisted suicide laws.

The best case scenario is that the woman would be allowed to end her life at a time of her choosing, with the assistance of her husband. The worst case scenario is that in that respect may be timed residency requirements in other country which would delay the woman's death and cause her more suffering. No one would be harmed by this alternative as long as the woman can achieve her goal. No lofty/value would automatically impair this alternative. There are no rules or principles that would automatically invalidate this alternative.

Ashraf, H. (2001). UK woman's right-to-die case fails. The Lancet, 356(9291), 1437.

e angel of compassion and the alleviation of unnecessary suffering would automatically invalidate this choice. The principles which would automatically invalidate this alternative are those of the woman and her husband, who remember they have the right to determine where and when she will die.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!