Topic: State the main points of Marcuses critique of Sartre, and consider the grounds on which Sartre might defend himself. Could Sartre succeed?
Herbert Marcuses critique of Sartre in existentialist school of thought: Remarks on Jean-Paul Sartres LEtre et le Neant is based on the claim that Sartres manner is ontologically impure, in that its depend of the nature of consciousness is in item abstracted from historical factors. This criticism was not specific to Sartre. Marcuses woo is rooted firmly in the so-called critical supposition developed in the thirties by Max Horkheimers fetch for Social Research, of which Marcuse was a member prior to World state of war Two. Horkheimer was concerned with providing a progressive response to what he saying as a growing recourse to antirationalist philosophies. He believed that philosophy need not give up on rationalism, merely that in order to bring it up to date, a materialist account of its nature, condition, and limits must be provided. In addition, he believed in preserving a strong distinction between true and false consciousness.
In this vein, Marcuse takes render with Sartres account of being-for- new(prenominal)s, which is based on a flip-flopping between two modes of interaction.
As beings in a social world, according to Sartre, an ingrained part of who we are has an independent existence, in the form of other peoples perceptions and opinions of us. We jakes either seek to dominate the others consciousness or be dominated ourselves, but never both, as
/*
the other can only exist for us in two forms: if I experience him with evidence, I fail to know him [and hence myself]; if I know him, if I act upon him, I only nark his being-as-object and his probable existence in the midst of the world.
*/
Marcuse points out that this departure takes the same form as...
If you want to get a replete essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment