In his book The Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle discusses the model of seriousice in Book V. evaluator is used with its some(prenominal) different connotations. However, in order to rationalize the producement that justice can only be make in the laws established by the state I would resembling to point out the last two types of justice and the model of equity Aristotle refers to in his book. The first is natural justice, true for everyone, and beside to that there is conventional justice which can differ in different societies and there is the notion of equity that works in unusual cases. With understanding these three concepts we can reach to the remnant that according to Aristotle justice can not only be found in the laws established by the state and he is right in claiming such an idea. Anyone who is a virtuous soulfulness can also be just. But not everyone who is just is also virtuous.
Would you consider someone who kills the murderer of his wife a murderer? Would you put him in the same position as Jack the Ripper? Do you think justice is protected by the law? Is it just to stone adulteresses to death even if it complies with the law? Which law is just and which is not? What are the criteria? Are the laws of the state enough to maintain justice?
Such questions can be boosted up to thousands if one starts to think about justice, itsconnotations and the relation between justice and law. The debate is a long-lasting one. In his book The Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle discusses the concept of justice in Book V. Justice is used with its many different connotations. There is particular justice, distributive justice, reciprocal justice, governmental and social justice, domestic justice, natural and conventional justice. I would analogous to...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment