Analyse Madame Roland's letter regarding 'The Massacre at The Champ de Mars' during the French Revolution. State what further information you would need.

The source provided is a discursive source intended for undercover use. Madame Roland writes it in letter format to a confidant. The source discusses her opinions and throwaway of The massacre of the Champs de Mars. The source does have a variety of strengths; it was written very close to the event, only unrivaled day later on the massacre occurred. The fact that it is a letter suggests that it will be a truthful account, as we would not expect anyone to take a breather to a confidant, especi all toldy about such a reality matter. However, she whitethorn withal be inclined to exaggerate events to supercharge sympathy for her political cause; using the term cut their brothers throats in reference to the National Guards. It is not a ballock chronicle so perhaps some of the facts have been misinterpreted. The letter, written one day after the event, leads us to question whether she is still surprise and perhaps this response is reactionary. Also as it has been translated there may be vital pieces of information missing or misinterpreted by dint of editing. We are too indecisive whether she attended the signing all day and witnessed this openly or is she repeating what someone has told her? We also only have the one opinion.



For a full shroud on the massacre we would need to combine this with other letters, formal documents and official reports, including that of the National Guards.

For a study of The massacre of the Champs de Mars I would want a full understanding of the National Guards and what they were instructed to do. I would also want to see the site to grasp the scale of the massacre. I would also need a copy of the petition that was being sign and I would want to elaborate on what the next...

If you want to get out a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper